In re E.R. CA2/1
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300), Ronnie R. (Father) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jurisdictional finding against him—that is marijuana abuse placed his four-year-old son and seven-year-old daughter at risk of serious physical harm, damage, danger, and failure to protect. We conclude Father’s challenge to the jurisdictional finding against him is not justiciable because, even if we were to reverse the finding, jurisdiction over Father’s children would continue based on the unchallenged jurisdictional findings against L.V., the children’s mother (Mother), and there is no effectual relief we can order for Father, as explained below. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
Comments on In re E.R. CA2/1