In re Ivan F. CA2/1
Adrian F. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s assertion of jurisdiction over his two sons, Ivan F. and Miguel F. (collectively, the children), under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(2), as well as the subsequent dispositional order removing both children from Father and ordering Father to complete reunification services. The juvenile court found that Father’s history of alcohol and substance abuse problems created a substantial risk of serious physical or emotional harm to the children, and that Father needed to complete a series of drug treatment programs to reunify with the children. Father denies any present or prior history of alcohol or substance abuse, and contends the evidence is insufficient to support these findings. Father also argues that the removal order should be vacated, claiming that the juvenile court removed the children pursuant to a statute that does not apply to Father as a noncustodial parent. Finally, Father challenges the ord
Comments on In re Ivan F. CA2/1