In re L.R. CA4/2
Joseph R. (father) appeals from the termination of his parental rights to his minor son, L.R., arguing that the juvenile court erred by failing to apply the parental bond exception under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) (unlabeled statutory references are to this code). We conclude that the juvenile court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence and that the court did not abuse its discretion by declining to apply the exception. We therefore affirm.
Comments on In re L.R. CA4/2