Carter v. Chancellor Health Care of Cal. VIII, In
Defendants Chancellor Health Care of California VIII, Inc., et al., doing business as Revere Court (Revere), appeal from the trial court’s denial of its petition to compel arbitration against plaintiffs Anita Carter et al. (individually Carter or collectively plaintiffs). On appeal, Revere contends (1) the trial court relied on improper legal criteria in determining that Carter’s son, who signed the agreement, needed a medical power of attorney in order to bind plaintiffs to arbitrate; (2) the trial court erred in concluding the arbitration provision was unconscionable; and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to stay a wrongful death claim while the elder abuse claim proceeded to arbitration. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Carter v. Chancellor Health Care of Cal. VIII, In