In re M.R. CA4/3
This is an appeal by father from the court’s finding that it had jurisdiction in the dependency proceeding involving minors M.R. and B.R. Father does not object to jurisdiction, per se—he acknowledges that jurisdiction over the minors was proper due to their mother’s behavior—but he contends the evidence does not support the jurisdictional findings the court made as to him. We have discretion to decline such an appeal. However, given the potentially adverse consequences of the court’s findings on father’s legal rights, we will reach the merits of his claim. Father seeks to strike the jurisdictional findings against him.
Comments on In re M.R. CA4/3