legal news


Register | Forgot Password

W.R. v. Superior Court CA4/2
Petitioner W.R. (Father) seeks extraordinary writ relief (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (l); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) from the juvenile court’s order made at a section 366.3 permanency planning review hearing terminating Father’s reunification services, denying return of his now two-year-old son L.O to his care, and setting a selection and implementation hearing (§ 366.26). He contends substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court’s finding that the return of his child to his custody would create a substantial risk of detriment to L.O.’s physical or emotional well-being. He further argues the juvenile court erred in ruling out the paternal grandmother (PGM) for placement. We do not find Father’s contentions meritorious, and we accordingly deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale