legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Reynolds CA4/3
Defendant Charles Michael Reynolds was convicted by a jury of felony murder and related offenses. Defendant’s subsequent Penal Code section 1170.95 petition to vacate his murder conviction and for resentencing was denied because the trial court determined defendant was ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law, citing the jury’s robbery-murder and street gang special circumstance findings. Defendant contends these special circumstance findings, which were made before the Supreme Court’s decisions in People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788, and People v. Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522, do not render defendant ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law. We agree, and accordingly vacate the trial court’s order denying defendant’s petition and remand for a hearing on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale