legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Criado CA6
Appellant Eddie Criado appeals from a judgment entered upon resentencing after a prior appeal. In the prior appeal, this court directed the trial court to strike two, one-year prior prison term enhancements it had previously imposed (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b) (hereafter section 667.5(b) )) in light of Senate Bill No. 136 (Stats. 2019, ch. 590) (Senate Bill 136) and to resentence Criado. At his resentencing hearing in January 2021, the trial court struck the prior prison term enhancements and sentenced Criado to six years in state prison. The trial court’s decision at resentencing to impose the upper term on one of the crimes of conviction rather than the previously imposed middle term resulted in the same aggregate sentence it had previously imposed. On appeal, Criado contends the trial court abused its sentencing discretion and requests remand for resentencing.
Although Criado’s original briefing in this appeal argued the trial court erred under Senate Bill 136, both parties

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale