In re M.L.
Appellant appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. and Inst. Code, S 366.26) to her daughter. Appellant contends the court erred at an earlier stage of these proceedings by finding she received reasonable reunification services. Although court deem appellant's contention, at least in part, to be timely under the circumstances, court nonethe less conclude there is substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding. Because appellant raises no other issue onappeal, court affirm the order terminating parental rights.
Comments on In re M.L.