R.S. v. M.N. CA4/1
Appellant R.S. (mother) appeals from findings and an order after hearing entered in November 2020 in which the family court, among other things, denied her request to modify custody of her and respondent father
M.N.’s two minor children and ordered that she pay $4,950 in Family Code section 271 sanctions. The court ordered the sanctions in part finding mother constantly attempted to relitigate and ask for court orders on the same issues, intending to harass father and causing unnecessary and burdensome litigation. In an opening brief with a dearth of record cites, mother contends: (1) the court abused its discretion by not considering what she claims is a history of abuse by M.N. before it made its custody determination; (2) the court erred by making a July 8, 2020 order without putting witnesses under oath; and (3) the court abused its discretion by imposing section 271 sanctions, which put an unreasonable financial burden on her. We affirm.
Comments on R.S. v. M.N. CA4/1