legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.R. CA4/2
S.R. was removed from her biological parents shortly after birth in 2020. She was eventually placed with a family who had previously adopted one of her biological siblings. Two days before a scheduled permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, S.R.’s paternal aunt and uncle, defendants and appellants B.G. and S.G., filed a petition pursuant to section 388 seeking placement of S.R. in their home. The juvenile court denied the request, and appellants appeal from this order, requesting that we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the relative placement preference set forth in section 361.3.
While this appeal was pending, the juvenile court held a continued permanency planning hearing pursuant to section 366.26, terminated the parental rights of S.R.’s biological parents, and selected a permanent plan of adoption for S.R. In light of these subsequent events, we conclude this court cannot grant appellants any effective relief by way

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale