In re A.C. CA3
To put K.C.’s contention in context, we take judicial notice of the record in her related pending appeal, case No. C093887, from orders issued by the juvenile court in Siskiyou County prior to transfer of the case to Butte County. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
Mother had an extensive child welfare history and reportedly did not feel she could provide for the minor. Because K.C. was willing to care for the minor, mother stated she intended for the minor to live with K.C. and the half-brother D.C. K.C. arrived at the hospital shortly after the minor was born and was permitted to take the minor pursuant to a safety plan prohibiting D.C. from living in the family home due to his substance abuse, mental health concerns, and criminal history. The probate court in Siskiyou County subsequently issued an ex parte order appointing K.C. the temporary guardian of the minor, but a social worker informed K.C. that the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) would not support K
Comments on In re A.C. CA3