P. v. Romero
Following the denial of their motions to traverse the search warrant and suppress evidence found in the search, appellants entered the following no contest pleas and admissions: (1) Jose pled no contest toconspiracy to commit the crime of transportationof cocaine (Pen. Code, S 182, subd. (a)(1); Health and Saf. Code, S 11352, subd. (a) (count 1)) and possession of an assault weapon(Pen. Code, S 12280, subd. (b) (count 7), and admitted allegations associated with count I that the substance exceeded four kilograms by weight (Health and Saf. Code, S 11370.4, subd. (a)(2)) and he was a principal armed with a firearmin the commission of the crime (Pen. Code, S 12022, subd. (a)(1)); (2)Guillermo pled no contest to count 1 and admitted allegations that he suffereda prior conviction of possession of a controlled substance with the intent tosell (Health and Saf. Code, S 11370.2, subd. (a)) and the substance exceeded four kilograms by weight (Health and Saf. Code, S 11370.4, subd. (a)(2)); and(3) Carlos pled no contest to transportation for sale of cocaine (Health and Safe. Code, S 11352, subd. (a) (count 5)). All other counts and allegationsagainst appellants were dismissed. The court sentenced appellants to stateprison as follows: (1) Jose to 10 years; (2) Guillermo to 13 years; and (3)Carlos to four years.
On appeal, appellants contend the trial courterred in denying their motions to traverse the search warrant and suppressevidence retrieved as a result of the search. Appellants have requested thiscourt independently review a sealed portion of the search warrant and the reporter's transcript of an in camera hearing the trial court conducted. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Romero