In re A.B. CA3
These related dependency matters involve claims by various parties challenging the juvenile court’s orders removing the two minors from the parents’ care and custody, denying placement of the minors with the paternal great-aunt, and extending reunification services to the parents. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 361, 361.3, 395.) The final brief was filed in these consolidated cases in June 2021.
In case No. C091040, L.B., father of the minors (father), contends the juvenile court improperly removed the children from their parents’ care and denied placement with the paternal great-aunt. The San Joaquin County Human Services Agency (Agency) counters that there was substantial evidence to support the juvenile court’s removal order. The Agency further argues the parents lack standing to challenge the juvenile court’s placement order and, in any event, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying placement with the paternal great-aunt.
In consolidated case Nos. C092447 and
Comments on In re A.B. CA3