In re S.S. CA4/2
H.S. (father) appeals from a juvenile court’s order at the 18-month permanency review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) terminating his reunification services and setting a hearing under section 366.26 to consider the implementation of a permanent plan regarding his daughter, S.S. (the child). Father contends that the court failed to make the necessary finding that return of the child to his custody would create a substantial risk of detriment to her well-being, and that there was insufficient evidence to support a detriment finding. We affirm.
Comments on In re S.S. CA4/2