Burgardt v. The Golden 1 Credit Union CA3
The Golden 1 Credit Union (Golden 1) appeals from denial of its motion to compel arbitration of a putative class action challenging the assessment and collection of insufficient fund fees. Golden 1 contends the superior court erred in determining that it failed to show that Dwaine Burgardt received notice of an arbitration provision Golden 1 introduced in 2019. When Burgardt opened an account with Golden 1 in 2013, he signed an application that included his agreement to Golden 1’s terms and conditions but did not mention arbitration or that Golden 1 could unilaterally amend the terms and conditions. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to compel arbitration.
Comments on Burgardt v. The Golden 1 Credit Union CA3