In re E.S. CA3
J.S., the minor’s mother, appeals from the juvenile court’s orders exercising dependency jurisdiction and removing the minor from her custody. She argues the Sacramento County Department of Child, Family and Adult Services (the Department) failed to comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (the ICWA) because the Department did not adequately inquire into mother’s claim of possible Choctaw heritage. (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 224.2.) We will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re E.S. CA3