P. v. Alaniz CA5
Defendant Daniel Dominguez Alaniz, Jr. was convicted by a jury of resisting an executive officer by force, battery with injury to a peace officer, resisting arrest, and possession of drug paraphernalia, and admitted a prior prison term enhancement, and three prior strike convictions within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (c)–(j), 1170.12, subds. (a)–(e) ). Defendant previously appealed in this case (F076254). In her first appeal, she successfully contended that (1) the sentence on the battery conviction was required to be stayed pursuant to section 654, (2) the resisting arrest conviction was required to be reversed because it was a lesser included offense, and (3) the matter had to be remanded for recalculation of presentence custody credits.
Comments on P. v. Alaniz CA5