legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.C. CA5
Heather S. (mother) and Alex C. (father) (collectively, the parents) appeal the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights to their now three-year-old son, L.C., and two-year-old daughter, C.C. (the children), and selecting adoption as their permanent plan (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26). Mother contends the juvenile court erred by declining to apply the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to termination of parental rights (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Father, joined by mother, contends remand is required because the juvenile court failed to correctly apply our Supreme Court’s recent decision of In re Caden C. (2021) 11 Cal.5th 614 (Caden C.). We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale