P. v. Rodriguez CA3
Defendant Carlos Daniel Rodriguez, Jr., appeals from his conviction for two counts of robbery with weapons enhancements. Defendant contends the trial court erred under Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 and People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 by denying his motion arguing that the prosecutor exercised a peremptory challenge to excuse prospective juror F.Y. based on his race. Defendant also claims the court abused its discretion by admitting evidence related to his arrest and his gang membership.
Comments on P. v. Rodriguez CA3