legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re B.E. CA4/3
L.G. (Mother) is the mother of B.E., who was taken into protective custody at the age of four. Mother appeals from the orders, entered in October 2021, denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 (further code references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code) and terminating her parental rights pursuant to section 366.26. B.E.’s father, A.E. (Father), did not appeal from the order terminating his parental rights. Mother contends the juvenile court violated her due process rights by denying her section 388 petition and terminating parental rights because, she claims, she had not been given adequate notice of the dependency proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale