legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Cingular Cases
Plaintiffs filed separate but later consolidated proposed class action lawsuits (hereafter class action lawsuits) against defendants and appellants Pacific Bell Wireless LLC and Cingular Wireless LLC (collectively Cingular), asserting various causes of action based on alleged misrepresentations made by Cingular to its customers. Cingular filed motions to compel arbitration relying on arbitration clauses in its service contracts. The trial court denied the motions, finding the arbitration clauses procedurally and substantively unconscionable. Cingular appeals.
The order denying the motion to compel arbitration is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale