P. v. Ruether CA5
Defendant Jeffrey Wayne Ruether was convicted of crimes arising from the sexual abuse of his daughter, Jane Doe. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 1190, (2) the trial court erred in instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 225 rather than CALCRIM No. 224, and (3) the trial court’s errors were cumulatively prejudicial. We affirm
Comments on P. v. Ruether CA5