In re E.S. CA2/3
Father challenges orders placing his daughter E.S. with an out-of-state nonrelated family member and later terminating dependency jurisdiction with a legal guardianship for the nonrelated family member. Father contends the court made the original placement order in violation of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC or Compact, Fam. Code, § 7901 et seq.) and he maintains the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding that returning E.S. to his custody would be detrimental to the child’s health and safety. He also argues the court erred in denying his petition to modify the order terminating reunification services without a hearing. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388.) We affirm.
Comments on In re E.S. CA2/3