legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McDonald
Defendant was convicted by a jury of three counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, SS 459, 460); attempted first degree burglary (SS 459, 460, 664), petty theft with a prior (SS 484, 666), possession of stolen property (S 496, subd. (a)), and possession of a firearm by a felon (S 12021, subd. (a)(1)). True findings were also made that Defendant had served a separate prison term (S 667.5, subds. (a), (b)) and had been convicted of serious/violent felonies within the meaning of the three strikes law (SS 667, subds (b) - (i), 1170.12, 668). He was sentenced to a total term of 22 years and 4 months.
On appeal, Defendant contends reversal is required because a photographic line up was impermissibly suggestive; the court erred in admitting impeachment evidence or his counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the evidence; an enhancement should have been stricken rather than stayed; and the abstract of judgment needs to be corrected. Court find merit to the last two contentions and therefore order the judgment modified. Otherwise, court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale