P. v. Brown CA4/3
Isaac David Jacob Brown appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of murder, attempted murder, shooting at an occupied motor vehicle, and unlawful possession of ammunition, and found true firearm enhancements. Brown argues the following: the trial court erred by admitting his custodial statements in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda); the court erred by admitting evidence or, alternatively he received ineffective assistance of counsel; the court erred in instructing the jury; the court erred in sentencing him; and there was cumulative error.
Comments on P. v. Brown CA4/3