Lingenbrink v. Games CA4/1
Intervener, cross-defendant and appellant Grande de los Suenos, S.R.L. (Grande) appeals from (1) an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and (2) a judgment following a jury’s special verdict in favor of plaintiff, cross-complainant and respondent Georg Lingenbrink on Lingenbrink’s cross-complaint for third party breach of contract. The judgment stemmed from Lingenbrink’s action against Stephen Games alleging, among other things, breach of an agreement to provide water at no cost for Lingenbrink’s property in Baja California Sur, Mexico (the property). Grande, which had taken over the development where Lingenbrink’s property is located, intervened in the action seeking a judicial declaration that no agreement existed between it and Lingenbrink for water delivery. Lingenbrink cross-complained against Grande and its owners and Grande moved to dismiss Lingenbrink’s action (or alternatively his cross-complaint) on grounds of an inconvenient fo
Comments on Lingenbrink v. Games CA4/1