P. v. Ives CA2/3
A jury convicted John Harold Ives of sexually abusing his daughter over a period of several years. On appeal, Ives argues that the trial court’s admission of his statements made during a custodial interrogation violated Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 and the prosecutor committed reversible error in her closing argument when she misstated the law on sexual intercourse by telling the jury that a penis “hitting” a vagina, or the lips of vagina, is sexual intercourse and rape on a child. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ives CA2/3