P. v. Vazquez CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Oscar Avila Vazquez filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We requested supplemental briefing on: (1) the applicability of Senate Bill No. 567 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2021, ch. 731, § 1.3), Assembly Bill No. 124 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2021, ch. 695, § 5), and Assembly Bill No. 1540 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2021, ch. 719, § 2) to this case; and (2) “[t]he inconsistencies between the advisements in defendant’s plea form that say his custody credits will not exceed 20 percent, when defendant, by virtue of his conviction for a violation of Penal Code section 288, is actually subject to a 15 percent limit (Pen. Code, §§ 667.5, 2933.1),[ ] consistent with the court’s custody credit award.” Having reviewed the supplemental briefing and the record as required by Wen
Comments on P. v. Vazquez CA3