legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.P. CA3
J.P., biological father of minor N.P. (father), appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying him presumed father status and reunification services as to N.P. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 361.5, 395; statutory section citations that follow are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Father contends he met the criteria for presumed father status under Family Code section 7611, subdivision (d), and the presumption of paternity was not rebutted. He further argues that even if he was correctly designated only a biological father, the court abused its discretion when it denied him reunification services. We affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale