P. v. Eggman CA3
A jury found defendant David James Eggman guilty of counts including second degree murder and attempted murder. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) substantial evidence did not support his convictions as the prosecution failed to prove he did not act in self-defense; and (2) the prosecutor’s closing argument relied on facts not in evidence and improper propensity evidence. We will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Eggman CA3