legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bell CA4/1
In the original appeal in this case, we issued our opinion in People v. Bell (Apr. 17, 2019, D072748 [nonpub. opn.]) (Bell), affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment against defendant Kurese Bell and remanding the matter with directions for the trial court to consider any Penal Code section 1170.95 petition filed by Bell and exercise its discretion under then newly amended section 12022.53 to strike or dismiss any or all of his firearm enhancements. In resentencing Bell on remand, the court considered and denied Bell’s section 1170.95 petition and declined to strike or dismiss any of his section 12022.53 enhancements.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale