P. v. Reynolds CA6
Defendant was committed to a state hospital after he was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity. Following a year as a supervised outpatient, defendant petitioned the trial court for an unconditional release from his commitment on grounds that his sanity had been legally restored. He appeals from the denial of that request, arguing that the trial court relied on irrelevant and insufficient evidence. Finding no abuse of discretion or due process violation, we will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Reynolds CA6