Sehmbey v. Superior Court CA5
Defendant seeks postconviction relief from his conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery of Manjit Singh. We conclude the evidence on which he relies was either: not “newly discovered,” or not “evidence of actual innocence,” or was lacking in credibility. (See Pen. Code, §§ 1473.6–1473.7.) We therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief.
Comments on Sehmbey v. Superior Court CA5