legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.X. CA5
Minor, D.X., appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order granting her father, N.X. (father), reunification services after sustaining allegations under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (d) that he sexually abused her. D.X. contends the court should have denied father reunification services under section 361.5, subdivision (b)(6), which applies where the child has been severely sexually abused as defined in the statute and it would not benefit the child to reunify with the parent. D.X. contends that although the manner in which father sexually abused her is not specifically identified in the statute, the statute does not limit the specific acts of sexual abuse that the court can deem “severe.” The court’s failure to apply the statute in her case, she argues, is reversible error. We concur and reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale