P. v. Stinson CA3
Codefendants Antuan Jermale Stinson and Harold Miles were convicted of the murder and attempted robbery of T.L. (the father), the attempted murder of T.L.’s son (the son), and the killing of T.L.’s dog (the dog).
On appeal, Stinson and Miles jointly argue that (1) the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument; (2) the trial court erred in declining to declare a mistrial based on juror misconduct; and (3) the trial court erred in denying their challenge to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenge to dismiss a juror.
Comments on P. v. Stinson CA3