legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Olson
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of five counts charged in an indictment. All of those counts related to the manufacture of methamphetamine and issues relating thereto. The jury also found true several charged enhancements, including one alleging that appellant was personally armed with a firearm. (Pen. Code, S 12022, subd. (c).) The trial judge subsequently sentenced appellant to a nine year prison term. Defendant appeals, claiming: (1) Miranda error; (2) improper denial of his motion to suppress evidence; (3) improper denial of his motion to compel disclosure of the name of a confidential informant; and (4) instructional error regarding the arming enhancement. Court reject all of these claims and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale