22 P. v. Houser CA3
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a patdown search, defendant Jason Patrick Houser pled no contest to possession for sale of a controlled substance. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying the motion because the search was neither supported by reasonable suspicion nor lawful in its scope.
Although we acknowledge that under a slightly different factual scenario our decision could well be different, on these specific facts we uphold the search and affirm the judgment.
Comments on 22 P. v. Houser CA3