Firsov v. Zhukovsky CA6
We resolve this case by memorandum opinion under California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853–855.)
This is one of two appeals arising from Sergey Firsov’s unsuccessful civil harassment restraining order petition against Constantin Zhukovsky. In the other appeal (case No. H048544), he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to disqualify opposing counsel. Here he appeals an award of attorney fees that followed his voluntary dismissal of the action.
Firsov represented himself in the trial court, as he does on appeal. His application for a restraining order alleged he is entitled to the requested order because Zhukovsky is an attorney who agreed to represent him but later refused. He also alleged Zhukovsky improperly disclosed confidential information about him. Zhukovsky, through counsel, filed a response denying he ever agreed to represent Firsov and denying ever having possessed, let
Comments on Firsov v. Zhukovsky CA6