Holly Hill Investments v. Flaherty CA2/5
Appellant Vince Flaherty appeals from the trial court’s entry of a workplace violence restraining order. Because the order has expired and the record does not reflect any request for renewal of the order, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
The parties are familiar with the facts and our opinion does not meet the criteria for publication. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1105(c).) We accordingly resolve the cause before us, consistent with constitutional requirements, via a written opinion with reasons stated. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 14; Lewis v. Superior Court (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1232, 1261–1264 [three-paragraph discussion of issue on appeal satisfies constitutional requirement because “an opinion is not a brief in reply to counsel’s arguments”; “[i]n order to state the reasons, grounds, or principles upon which a decision is based, [an appellate] court need not discuss every case or fact raised by counsel in support of the parties’ positions”].)
Comments on Holly Hill Investments v. Flaherty CA2/5