legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re V.T. CA3
C.G. (mother) and M.T. (father; collectively referred to as parents) each appeal from the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights and freeing the minors, S.T. and V.T., for adoption. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) The parents jointly contend the juvenile court erred when it found the beneficial parental relationship exception to adoption did not apply to mother (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Father additionally argues that the court erred in granting a section 388 petition suspending his in-person visits with the minors.
We will affirm the juvenile court’s order granting the section 388 petition regarding father’s visitation, but reverse its orders terminating mother’s and father’s parental rights and remand for a new hearing on termination of parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale