In re M.M. CA4/3
M.M. (the child) was removed from M.B.’s (the mother) care when he was a few days old. The court eventually ended reunification services for her and set a hearing to terminate her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. At that hearing, she argued for application of the parental-benefit exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). The court found it did not apply and terminated her parental rights. She appeals this decision. We affirm the order because the court’s finding that she inconsistently visited the child is supported by substantial evidence. She has also failed to show termination of her parental rights would be detrimental to the child.
Comments on In re M.M. CA4/3