legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cassidy CA1/2
After Ernest Paul Cassidy III filed a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95 and the trial court issued an order to show cause to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, Cassidy filed a motion for mandatory resentencing, arguing he was entitled to have his murder conviction set aside as a matter of law. The trial court denied the motion, and Cassidy appeals that ruling.
Cassidy’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a brief asking this court for an independent review of the record, citing People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Cassidy was informed of his right to file supplemental briefing and he filed a brief on February 18, 2022.
We have considered Cassidy’s supplemental brief and reviewed the record, and we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale