legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Brynne B.
In this dependency case (Welf. and Inst. Code S 300 et seq.), the father of the dependent minor children Brynne B., Arnold B., Jr. and Avery B., (Father, Brynne, Arnold Jr., and Avery, respectively), has appealed from several orders of the trial court, specifically, orders made on February 17, March 23, May 19, July 6 and 7, 2006.
Father's notice of appeal was filed on July 7, 2006, and he does not explain how the notice could be timely as to all of the orders he challenges. Moreover, although he contends that his attorneys were ineffective in their assistance of him in this matter, for the reasons discussed below, court find Father's contentions do not warrant reversal of the orders he has challenged here.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale