legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Flores CA4/1
We have independently reviewed the record in this case consistent with our obligations under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders). We deem appellant’s request for judicial notice filed December 14, 2021, to be a motion to augment the record with documents properly before the trial court. Accordingly, we grant the motion. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.155(a).) We conclude there are no arguable issues on appeal other than a correction of a clerical error on the abstract of judgment. We, therefore, order the clerk of the superior court to strike from the abstract of judgment the criminal justice administration fee in the amount of $308 because it does not conform to the court’s pronouncement of judgment. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale