legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Delgado CA5
In 2002, defendant Federico Luis Delgado was sentenced to 26 years 8 months for offenses he committed when he was 20 years old. This was a second-strike sentence under the “Three Strikes” law. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)–(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)–(d).) In April 2020, defendant filed a motion under section 1203.01 for an opportunity to preserve mitigating youth-related evidence for use at a future parole hearing pursuant to the California Supreme Court decisions in People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 (Franklin) and In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439 (Cook). As defendant was ineligible for a youth offender parole hearing under section 3051 as a second-strike offender, the trial court denied the motion.
Defendant concedes he is ineligible for a youth offender parole hearing under section 3051, and he does not challenge that exclusion.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale