In re Esperanza M.
Father, the presumed father of one year old appeals from termination of his parental rights at the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 permanency hearing. Father contends error occurred at the earlier 12-month review hearing, when the court terminated reunification services and referred the case to the .26 hearing. He also argues his counsel at the 12-month review hearing was ineffective.
The order is affirmed.
Comments on In re Esperanza M.