P. v. Ortiz CA6
Appellants Nicholas Jon Ortiz and Andrew Daniel Muir appeal from judgments entered after convictions by plea. Appointed counsel for Muir has filed a brief asking this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (See People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Muir was advised of the right to file a supplemental brief but has not responded. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to Muir, we affirm the judgment.
Ortiz raises two claims of error. For the reasons explained below, we modify Ortiz’s term of probation to two years and order one condition of probation stricken as duplicative. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ortiz CA6