legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pereles CA6
In 1997, a jury convicted defendant Eddy Jay Pereles of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187), conspiracy to commit robbery (§ 182, subd. (a)(1)), and second degree robbery (§§ 211, 212.5, subd. (b)). The jury found true the special circumstance allegation that defendant committed the murder during a robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), and the allegation that a principal was armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (d)) during the commission of the murder and the robbery. The superior court sentenced defendant to life without the possibility of parole, with a consecutive two-year term for the arming enhancement associated with the murder count. In 2000, this court ordered a restitution fine stricken and affirmed the judgment in case No. H018342.
Defendant subsequently filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support the felony-murder special circumstance finding under People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 (Banks).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale