P. v. Valverde CA3
After a jury found defendant William Rene Valverde guilty of numerous sexual offenses against his daughter, L., and his girlfriend’s daughter, R., the trial court sentenced him to 139 years to life. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court prejudicially erred by (1) excluding evidence that R.’s mother gave her condoms and instructions on their usage; and (2) permitting improper expert testimony on child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS). Finding no merit to the first contention and the second argument to be forfeited, we will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Valverde CA3